The effect of bioRxiv preprints on citations and altmetrics - preLights
Quantifying and contextualizing the impact of bioRxiv preprints through automated social media audience segmentation | bioRxiv
A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions | bioRxiv
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | bioRxiv
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | bioRxiv
The effect of bioRxiv preprints on citations and altmetrics | bioRxiv
Quantifying and contextualizing the impact of bioRxiv preprints through automated social media audience segmentation | bioRxiv
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | bioRxiv
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | bioRxiv
PDF) bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology
Do preprints improve with peer review? A little, one study suggests | Science | AAAS
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | bioRxiv
A Multi-perspective Analysis of Retractions in Life Sciences | bioRxiv
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | bioRxiv
The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications | bioRxiv
Journals Lose Citations to Preprint Servers - The Scholarly Kitchen
Journals Lose Citations to Preprint Servers - The Scholarly Kitchen
Submitting manuscripts from MedRxiv/BioRxiv to JMIR journals (M2JMIR) – JMIR Publications
The effect of bioRxiv preprints on citations and altmetrics | bioRxiv
What bioRxiv's first 30,000 preprints reveal about biologists
The effect of bioRxiv preprints on citations and altmetrics | bioRxiv
Prachee Avasthi on Twitter: "Here are some slides I show sometimes with data (from https://t.co/KjZF1X0Ji2) on skewed journal citation distributions. JIF is a preposterous and inappropriate measure of individual article quality. Don't
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | bioRxiv
Meta-Research: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | eLife
